• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Alyssa Luck

Alyssa Luck

  • About Me
  • Deep Dives
  • The IBD Index
  • Functional Orthodontics
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Contact Me
  • Show Search
Hide Search

The Specific Carbohydrate Diet (SCD) for IBD: Everything You Need to Know

Alyssa Luck · Mar 14, 2022 · Leave a Comment

Summary: The Specific Carbohydrate Diet is an increasingly popular dietary intervention for IBD patients that involves limiting dietary carbohydrate to monosaccharides, or simple sugars. In practical terms, this involves eliminating all sources of starch, as well as sugar (sucrose) and lactose. It has anecdotally been extremely helpful for a variety of digestive issues, and some published clinical research is beginning to accumulate suggesting benefit for IBD patients, although the best-designed trial thus far does not demonstrate any benefit over a “Mediterranean” diet. Further, the scientific theory underlying the SCD principles does not stand up to our current understanding of the role of intestinal bacteria in IBD, and more importantly, does not support the “fanatical adherence” called for. Ultimately, the diet has helped a great number of IBD sufferers and may be right for some people, but there are likely other dietary and lifestyle approaches that could deliver similar or greater benefit with less restrictiveness and easier-to-follow guidelines.

This article is part of the IBD Index. Last updated on March 14, 2022.

This article aims to give a high-level overview of the Specific Carbohydrate Diet, as well as practical guidance. For a deep (deep, deep) dive into the science, check out The Science Behind the Specific Carbohydrate Diet (SCD): Brilliant or Bunk?.

Ah, the Specific Carbohydrate Diet. I’ll save my experience with it for another time and keep this page as objective as possible, but as a disclaimer: this is the diet I stuck to religiously for the vast majority of the ~3 years between being diagnosed with UC in 2008 and having my colon removed in 2011. (So at the very least, I’m writing from a place of experience!)

From the looks of it, the diet has only grown in popularity since that time. Even giant online health websites like WebMD, VeryWellFit, and Healthline are chiming in about it. (You don’t need to go read those pages. Just keep reading this one; it’s better.)

This post will give you an overview of the SCD, where it came from, the rationale behind it, pros/cons, and things to watch out for. I also link some relevant resources, and at the bottom of the post (as usual) you’ll find a literature review of sorts. An annotated bibliography, if you will.

Table of Contents:
Who came up with the Specific Carbohydrate Diet?
What is the Specific Carbohydrate Diet?
What is the theory behind the Specific Carbohydrate Diet?
Is the theory valid?
Is there any clinical evidence for the Specific Carbohydrate Diet?
What’s the deal with “illegal” foods?
Should I try the Specific Carbohydrate Diet?
Resources
Review of the literature

We are faced, then, with intestinal disorders which involve microbial populations which have been altered in number, in kind, or both. The normal contractions (peristalsis) of the intestinal muscles are not able to remove them; they appear to be tenacious. Indeed, there is evidence that intestinal microbes will not cause disease unless they develop methods of adhering to the gut wall. Antibiotic therapy is of limited usefulness while other drugs of the cortisone and sulfa families have side-effects if continued too long.

A sensible and harmless form of warfare on the aberrant population of intestinal microbes is to manipulate their energy (food) supply through diet. Most intestinal microbes require carbohydrates for energy, and the Specific Carbohydrate Diet severely limits the availability of carbohydrates. By depriving intestinal microbes of their energy source, their numbers gradually decrease along with the products they produce.

Elaine Gottschall, Breaking the Vicious Cycle p. 16

Who came up with the Specific Carbohydrate Diet?

The earliest iteration of the SCD was developed in the 1930’s by Dr. Sidney Haas to treat patients with celiac disease. He lays out his protocol, along with the supporting science and case studies, in his 1951 book “Management of Celiac Disease.” (If anyone is interested, you can read much of the book for free at the above link. It’s quite fascinating reading medical perspectives from the early 1900s; the language is so different! One referenced paper is titled “The Value of Banana in the Treatment of Celiac Disease.” Fun right?)

The SCD hit the mainstream in the 1990s thanks to Elaine Gottschall, whose daughter was diagnosed with UC and was successfully treated by Dr. Haas using his version of the specific carbohydrate diet. (Apparently she was free from symptoms after two years and returned to a normal diet after seven, reportedly remaining in excellent health on a normal diet for over 20 years thereafter.)

Gottschall took Dr. Haas’ specific carbohydrate diet as a starting point and expanded upon it to create the modern version of the SCD. The diet as described in her 1987 book Breaking the Vicious Cycle is, for all intents and purposes, the “official” version of the SCD.

What is the Specific Carbohydrate Diet?

The SCD only allows carbohydrates in the form of monosaccharides (ie “simple sugars” like fructose, glucose, or galactose), which are found in fruits, non-starchy vegetables, and honey. Thus, it excludes all starches, as well as lactose and table sugar (ie sucrose), which are disaccharides. In practical terms, this means:

Yes: Meats, fish, fruits, vegetables, hard cheeses, homemade 24-hour-fermented yogurt (to remove all the lactose), nuts, seeds, honey

No: Grains (wheat, corn, rice, oats, etc), potatoes, lactose-containing dairy (milk, ice cream, soft cheeses), sugar

Legumes (beans and lentils) are allowed if properly prepared once someone has been on the diet for at least three months

While this is not a low-carbohydrate diet, it often ends up being low carb in practice, since most dense sources of carbohydrates are removed.

Also, of note, there is a specific order recommended for the introduction of foods. If someone has diarrhea and/or significant digestive symptoms, Gottschall recommends starting with the “intro” diet, which emphasizes meats and avoids most plant foods. At this point, the diet is certainly low carb.

The purpose of the Specific Carbohydrate Diet is to deprive the microbial world of the intestine of the food it needs to overpopulate. By using a diet which contains predominantly “predigested” carbohydrates, the individual with an intestinal problem can be maximally nourished without over-stimulation of the intestinal microbial population.

Elaine Gotschall, Breaking the Vicious Cycle

What is the theory behind the Specific Carbohydrate Diet?

The theory behind the SCD is fairly simple: people with digestive disease have damaged small intestinal microvilli and therefore a compromised ability to break down and absorb carbohydrates. These unabsorbed carbohydrates feed bacteria, leading to bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine, whose metabolic actions and by-products further damage the microvilli of the small intestine. This is the “vicious cycle” referred to in the book Breaking the Vicious Cycle.

To get more specific: carbohydrates are molecules of varying size and complexity that are made up of three building blocks: glucose, fructose, and galactose. These three building blocks are “monosaccharides,” and do not need to be broken down any further to be absorbed. Two monosaccharides stuck together is a “disaccharide,” examples being sucrose, ie table sugar (glucose + fructose) and lactose (glucose + galactose). More complex carbohydrate molecules include starches, which are long chains of many glucose units.

The whole idea behind the SCD is that by only allowing monosaccharides, they will be absorbed by the body rather than feeding bacteria in the gut, and without a food source, the bacteria in the gut will die, allowing the intestine to heal.

Although there is still insufficient evidence to link a specific microbe to each of the chronic intestinal disorders, it is generally agreed that intestinal microbes are not innocent bystanders.

Elaine Gottschall, Breaking the Vicious Cycle

Is the theory valid?

Yes and no.

In many ways, Elaine Gotschall was ahead of her time. Her focus on intestinal bacteria as centrally important to digestive illness was well ahead of the curve, considering she was researching and writing this book in the 1980s. If you search the word “microbiome” in PubMed, you can see that the explosion of microbiome-related research didn’t start picking up until years later around 2010, and even now in 2021, the standard of care for IBD is still focused on suppressing the body’s immune response rather than modulating intestinal bacteria.

That said, many aspects of Gotschall’s theory are too simplistic in light of more recent research. I delve deeper into the science behind the Specific Carbohydrate Diet in my post here, but the short version is that, while Breaking the Vicious Cycle gets a lot right, it understates the complexity involved in bacterial dysbiosis. It can’t be denied that the SCD works for many people, but ultimately, there are probably different approaches to addressing dysbiosis in UC that are less restrictive, easier to follow, and/or are more effective.

Is there any clinical evidence for the Specific Carbohydrate Diet?

You can scroll down to the Reference list for a full lit review/annotated bibliography of sorts, but aside from a couple case reports, there’s no UC-specific evidence. The vast majority of research so far has been done in Crohn’s disease, specifically in pediatric patients, although a few chart reviews, surveys, and other relatively low-quality studies have included both CD and UC patients.

This CD focus is consistent with the literature as a whole, where diet seems to be used more readily by the medical community as an intervention for CD than for UC. For instance, an elemental diet is first-line therapy for CD, especially pediatric CD, in many places. The same is not true of UC. (In light of that, it’s interesting to note that Gottschall saw the SCD as a whole-food elemental diet of sorts.)

My attempt to summarize the evidence: if we mentally lump UC and CD together as simply “IBD,” the body of evidence certainly shows promise for the effectiveness of the SCD. However, the trend seems to be that symptoms and lab markers resolve more readily than mucosal inflammation, and many patients do have trouble sticking strictly to the diet (which is a significant practical concern). Additionally, the largest and most rigorously designed trial we have to date did not find that the SCD was more beneficial for CD than a Mediterranean diet, indicating that it may be possible to achieve similar benefits to the SCD through less restrictive and easier-to-follow diets.

What’s the deal with “illegal” foods?

“The strictness of this diet cannot be overemphasized nor should the difficulty of adhering to it be minimized. Faithful observance requires intelligence and vigilance on the part of those taking care of the individual or on the part of the person who cooks for himself or herself. It is surprising how many times a child will manage, despite the best supervision, to get hold of forbidden food. It is equally surprising how many parents will decide, despite all warnings, that “just a taste” of ice cream, cookie, or candy will do no harm. Such infringements will seriously delay recovery and it is unwise to undertake this regimen unless you are willing to follow it with fanatical adherence.”

Elaine Gottschall, Breaking the Vicious Cycle (p. 68); emphasis in original text

As you can see from the above quote, one of the notable characteristics of the SCD is its rigidity. Unlike many other diets, where the “80/20” (or 90/10, or 95/5) concept may be employed and guidelines are simply taken as guidelines, this diet has rules. And it is repeatedly emphasized that breaking any of these rules will significantly compromise healing.

This rigidity is especially apparent in the diet terminology, where foods are either “allowed” or “illegal.” Yes, illegal. As if eating a bowl of oatmeal is a crime.

It even functions as a noun in the community. As in, “I accidentally ate some illegals today.”

I probably don’t have to tell you that that kind of language does not foster a healthy and well-balanced attitude towards food. And for some susceptible people (such as, ahem, myself), the community and overall framing of the SCD is a recipe for orthorexia.

Some might argue that the rigidity – even verging on orthorexia – is a necessary and worthwhile sacrifice for healing. I myself was of that opinion for years, and still believe that a certain amount of discipline and sacrifice can be good and necessary to achieve the health outcomes you want. But here’s the thing: aside from anecdotal reports, I see no support for that stance in this case.

Now, I’m not saying that the SCD isn’t helpful (it obviously is for many people!), nor am I saying the theory behind it is totally bunk. I have no doubt that the SCD does alter the microbiome, and it likely does dramatically reduce the usable food for bacteria in the small intestine, especially compared to a diet rich in processed grains and sugar.

What I am saying is that it’s not as clear cut as the book makes it out to be. First of all, even on strict SCD, you aren’t only eating monosaccharides, since most fruits and many vegetables contain sucrose. But even if you were, malabsorption of fructose (a monosaccharide) is quite common, especially in people with digestive disorders, so even sticking to monosaccharides isn’t remotely a guarantee that you aren’t “feeding the bacteria.” Anyone who has ever over-eaten fruit knows this.

There’s much more that could be said (and has been said, by me, in this other post), but my point is this: in a situation where even following the dietary rules to a T by no means perfectly deprives the intestinal bacteria of all food, I don’t think it’s reasonable to maintain such rigid “legal/illegal” designations for foods, nor to demand “fanatical adherence.” A perfectly “legal” meal including more honey or fruit than the person can absorb could easily cause more problems for them than trying a bite of ice cream, but the framing of the SCD does not facilitate that kind of nuanced thinking – to the detriment of the patient, in my opinion.

Lest you think I’m overreacting, I’d like to share just a few more quotes from the book:

“One basic principle of the diet must be firmly established and persistently repeated: no food should be ingested that contains carbohydrates other than those found in fruits, honey, properly-prepared yogurt, and those vegetables and nuts listed. While this principle may be clearly understood, it is sometimes difficult in practice to recognize the existence of carbohydrates in various foods. Small quantities of carbohydrates other than those designated often creep into the diet unless the strictest attention is paid to every item of food. Reading labels, although a good policy, is inadequate for those on the specific carbohydrate diet since one ingredient sometimes has numerous names and may not be easily recognized as a forbidden carbohydrate.” p. 61

“Canned vegetables, or vegetables packed in jars, are not permitted because many have added sugar or starch which the labels often do not indicate.” p. 63

“Apple juice, formerly an allowable beverage, has become a problem because some manufacturers are adding corn syrup and sugar which is not listed on the label. Therefore, choose an apple cider packed by a local company you feel is responsible. You can call or write to them to ensure that it is pure apple cider without added sweetener.” (p. 74)

To have a big issue with some sugar added to canned peas or bacon while allowing foods like apple juice and honey that can very easily result in malabsorbed carbohydrate is, to me, silly. If someone finds that they can chug a glass of apple juice no problem but has terrible bloating after eating sugar-cured bacon, then by all means, abide by those rules! But I think there are quite a few cases where an IBD patient might actually make worse, less-intuitive food choices for themselves trying not to break any of the SCD rules.

So should I try the Specific Carbohydrate Diet?

Generally, my philosophy is to provide information without telling anyone what to do. But since the SCD is the UC intervention I probably have the most experience with, I feel I would be remiss to not give you my take.

And my take is this: if you feel drawn to it, if you feel like it’s something you can maintain, and/or if you’ve tried other approaches without success, absolutely give it a shot. Just don’t let the trappings surrounding it make you so neurotic about food that you forget the other important things in life.

Also, one principle of the diet that I think is often lost is that Gotschall never intended this to be a forever diet. (Recall that her own daughter went off the diet after seven years, and reportedly maintained excellent health on a normal diet thereafter).

And finally, remember Elaine Gottschall’s words: “If you see no improvement after a one month trial, the diet will probably not work for you.” Don’t get so caught up in the theory behind the diet that you forget to assess whether it’s working for you. And if it isn’t, move on.

Resources

  • The Specific Carbohydrate Diet in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Evidence and Execution. (PDF) This is included in the Reference list below, but I wanted to include it as a resource as well because the full PDF (published in 2019) is available at that link, and it’s part scientific review and part practical guide and is an excellent place to start for anyone wanting to learn more, as well as a good all-in-one resource to print and give to a doctor or parent.
  • Breaking the Vicious Cycle Website. Central repository for all things SCD. Note that the purpose of this website is to promote and expound on the diet (including the science behind it) as laid out in the book Breaking the Vicious Cycle. In other words, it’s not objective, and you probably won’t find any critiques of the diet or science, so take the information there with a grain of salt and don’t use it as a be-all-end-all guide to treating your IBD. That said, it’s an excellent practical resource for following the diet if you decide to give it a shot!
  • Pecanbread Website. Perhaps even more comprehensive than the official Breaking the Vicious Cycle website, but just as one-sided, so again – use as an excellent resource if you try the SCD, but be aware that the SCD is not the only and final solution to IBD.
  • Elana’s Pantry. Great source for SCD recipes.
  • Danielle Walker is a popular Paleo blogger/cookbook author who actually started out on the SCD, but never fully went into remission on it, and over time modified her diet to be more akin to Paleo than SCD.
  • Jordan and Steve found relief from gut issues through SCD and were well-known advocates of the diet for quite a while through their website SCDLifestyle.com, but they’ve now rebranded as “Healthy Gut” and appear to have shifted focus to selling supplements, and perhaps also a more holistic view of health.

Review of the Literature

Below is a fairly comprehensive collection of all published papers involving the SCD for IBD (in reverse chronological order). I included all research for both UC and CD, because research on UC specifically is almost nonexistent. The majority of research is in CD patients (mostly pediatric) and is relatively low quality in design: chart reviews, case reports, or very small uncontrolled studies. The first paper listed is the first (and only) large RCT on the SCD.

Lewis et al. A Randomized Trial Comparing the Specific Carbohydrate Diet to a Mediterranean Diet in Adults With Crohn’s Disease. 2021. Gastroenterology.

  • This is the first large-scale randomized trial in the U.S. showing that diet can significantly benefit adult patients with IBD (see article on Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation website summarizing the results and significance)
  • 194 adult CD patients were randomized to receive either the SCD or a Mediterranean diet
  • At 6 weeks, just under half of the participants in each cohort had achieved symptomatic remission (43.5% for Mediterranean diet, 46.5% for SCD)
  • SCD was not significantly more beneficial than Mediterranean diet, so study authors recommend Mediterranean diet due to easier adherence and other health benefits
  • Of note – this study was instigated based on web-based reported patient interest

Mehrtash, Farhad. Sustained Crohn’s Disease Remission with an Exclusive Elemental and Exclusion Diet: A Case Report. 2021. Gastrointest. Disord.

  • “This case shows clinical and biochemical remission and radiologic healing in a 25-year-old male, who is considered to have a moderate-to-severe form of CD due to ileocolonic and perianal disease, without using any medications through an exclusive elemental diet and an exclusion diet.” (The “exclusion diet” was the SCD)
  • “One of the limitations of this case report was that mucosal healing was not assessed with colonoscopy. Other objective measures, such as CRP and fecal calprotectin, however, showed significant decreases in disease activity.”

Turner, Dan and Hanauer, Stephen B. Which Diet for Crohn’s Disease? Food for Thought on the Specific Carbohydrate Diet, Mediterranean Diet, and Beyond. 2021. Gastroenterology.

  • Comment on Lewis et al RCT; good overview of dietary strategies that have been studied for Crohn’s disease

Britto, Savini Lanka and Kellermayer, Richard. Durable Clinical and Biochemical but Not Endoscopic Remission in Pediatric Crohn’s Disease on Specific Carbohydrate Diet Monotherapy. 2020. Ann Clin Lab Sci.

  • Conclusions: We report three pediatric CD patients who achieved clinical remission on SCD monotherapy, but failed to demonstrate complete mucosal healing with a minimum of one year follow up. This case report highlights that SCD monotherapy in male pediatric CD patients can sustain durable clinical and biochemical remission, but not full mucosal healing.

Suskind et al. The Specific Carbohydrate Diet and Diet Modification as Induction Therapy for Pediatric Crohn’s Disease: A Randomized Diet Controlled Trial. 2020. Nutrients.

  • 16 Crohn’s patients at Seattle Children’s Hospital were randomized to one of three diets (only 10 patients completed the study):
    • Strict SCD
    • modified SCD (mSCD): SCD + oats and rice
    • “whole food” diet: elimination of wheat, corn, milk, sugar, and food additives
  • By week 12, all 10 participants who completed the study had achieved and maintained clinical remission
  • the MSCD group had normalization and the SCD group had near normalization of ESR and CRP, the whole foods group did not
  • A detailed analysis of the patients’ microbiomes was done, but no significant trends in microbial composition were identified (this is consistent with previous findings that the microbiome is highly individualized)

Chitnavis, Maithili V and Braly, Kimberly L. The Specific Carbohydrate Diet in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Evidence and Execution. 2019. Practical Gastro.

  • Full PDF that’s part scientific summary/review and part practical guide. An excellent place to start for anyone wanting to learn more, and a good all-in-one resource to print and give to a doctor or parent

Suskind et al. Clinical and Fecal Microbial Changes With Diet Therapy in Active Inflammatory Bowel Disease. 2018. J Clin Gastroenterol.

  • In a small cohort of pediatric IBD patients, most experienced clinical and/or biochemical improvement over 12 weeks on the SCD, although a few enrolled patients dropped out of the study due to not being able to adhere to the diet
  • The researchers also measured microbiome changes over the course of the study, and suggest that improvements in disease state may be mediated by changes in the microbiome due to diet (as the SCD theory posits)

Dubrovsky, Alanna and Kitts, Christopher L. Effect of the Specific Carbohydrate Diet on the Microbiome of a Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Ulcerative Colitis Patient. 2018. Cureus.

  • Case report of a 20-year-old girl whose UC was refractory to multiple drug treatments; started SCD and had all UC symptoms controlled within a week
  • Report reviews changes in microbiome; overall, species diversity and evenness increased to near control levels, but species richness remained low

Xiong et al. The role of specific carbohydrate diet in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. 2018. Chinese Journal of Applied Pediatrics.

  • This appears to be a review article originally written/published in Chinese; concludes that SCD shows promise/benefit, but more research is needed

McCormick, Nora Maeve and Logomarsino, John V. The Specific Carbohydrate Diet in the Treatment of Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review. 2017. J Gastroenterol Hep Research.

  • All 8 studies included in the review showed benefit to patients with CD

Nakayuenyongsuk et al. Diet to the Rescue: Cessation of Pharmacotherapy After Initiation of Exclusive Enteral Nutrition (EEN) Followed by Strict and Liberalized Specific Carbohydrate Diet (SCD) in Crohn’s Disease. 2017. Dig Dis Sci.

  • Case report of a 15-year-old boy with Crohn’s disease; had clinical improvement with EEN, but still had elevated inflammatory markers, so tried SCD
  • Strict SCD steadily reduced inflammatory markers, and patients was able to stop methotrexate use after 2 months on the diet (timeline image below)
  • Intro has pretty good overview/lit review of SCD evidence as of 2017

Wahbeh et al. Lack of Mucosal Healing From Modified Specific Carbohydrate Diet in Pediatric Patients With Crohn Disease. 2017. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.

  • This is another retrospective chart review of pediatric patients at Seattle Children’s Hospital; in this case, only Crohn’s patients with SCD/modified SCD (mSCD) as the exclusive therapy were included
  • 7 patients were included; none were on strict SCD (all were mSCD), and had been on the diet for a range of 13-62 months;
  • Conclusions: In 7 asymptomatic patients with CD on an mSCD as sole therapy with normal or mildly abnormal albumin, CRP, and hematocrit but elevated stool calprotectin >50 μg/g, complete endoscopic mucosal healing was not demonstrated

Cohen, Stanley A. Alas, Who and What Can We Trust? Patients, Parents, Surrogate Markers, or the Specific Carbohydrate Diet. 2017. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.

  • Interesting comment/editorial on Wahbeh et al study underlining the importance of mucosal healing as an endpoint, the unreliability of symptoms and biochemical markers as surrogate endpoints, the limitations of diet as a therapy, and the overall challenges faced attempting to manage IBD

Braly et al. Nutritional Adequacy of the Specific Carbohydrate Diet in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease. 2017. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.

  • Conclusions: Nutrient intake of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease patients on the SCD was adequate when compared with a healthy peer reference population, but adequacy was variable when compared with the dietary recommended intakes.

Chutkan et al. Effect of the Specific Carbohydrate Diet on Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A 5-Year Longitudinal Study. 2017. Am J Gastroenterol.

  • Assessed 8 IBD patients who followed SCD (with varying levels of compliance) for 66 months
  • The average improvement in modified IBDQ score after implementation of SCD was 62%. The average time to see improvement after starting the diet was 30 days (range 3 days to 4 months). 4 out of 8 patients were able to discontinue biologics or immunosuppressive therapy as a result of the diet. Colonoscopy showed complete mucosal healing in 3 out of 8 patients, and active inflammation but with improvement from pre-SCD colonoscopy in 5 out of 8 patients.

Suskind et al. Patients Perceive Clinical Benefit with the Specific Carbohydrate Diet for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. 2016. Dig Dis Sci.

  • A survey of IBD patients on the SCD with 417 respondents
  • 33% reported remission after 2 months; 42% at both 6 and 12 months

Burgis et al. Response to strict and liberalized specific carbohydrate diet in pediatric Crohn’s disease. 2016. World J Gastroenterol.

  • Retrospective chart review of 11 pediatric CD patients
  • Most lab values improved while on strict SCD (alone or in combination with medication) and appeared stable after SCD liberalization

Obih et al. Specific carbohydrate diet for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease in clinical practice within an academic IBD center. 2016. Nutrition.

  • The Seattle Children’s Hospital uses the SCD in some of its pediatric IBD patients; this paper is based on a chart review of 26 patients treated with the SCD, either alone or in combination with medication
  • Success was mixed, but almost all achieved some clinical improvement with the diet; 12 of the patients experienced both clinical and biochemical improvements, and some were able to phase out medication to maintain remission through diet alone
  • Note that adherence was a challenge, and not all patients maintained a strict SCD; many added selected “illegal” foods

Kakodkar et al. The Specific Carbohydrate Diet for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Case Series. 2015. J Acad Nutr Diet.

  • The intro of this paper has the most thorough explanation of the theory behind the diet (as laid out in Breaking the Vicious Cycle) that I’ve seen in the literature, for anyone curious
  • 50 patients with IBD were surveyed, and the study authors collected food diaries, medical records, and questionnaires; the paper reviews various findings and trends
  • All 50 patients surveyed were in clinical remission, and the mean self-reported adherence rate to the diet was very high (about 95%)

Khandalavala, Birgit N and Nirmalraj, Maya C. Resolution of Severe Ulcerative Colitis with the Specific Carbohydrate Diet. 2015. Case Rep Gastroenterol.

  • First documented case report of an adult with UC going into remission using the SCD
  • 85-year-old woman experiencing a severe UC flare had symptom improvement within 3 months on SCD, clinical remission after one year, and resolution of pancolitis on colonoscopy after two years; all conventional treatment had failed to improve her condition

Cohen et al. Clinical and mucosal improvement with specific carbohydrate diet in pediatric Crohn disease. 2014. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.

  • Prospective study of 10 pediatric patients with CD; 9 stayed on SCD for the first 12 weeks, and 7 stayed on for the full 52 weeks; others dropped out due to difficulty adhering to diet, and most still in the study admitted to “cheating”
  • Similar to other results, most participants experienced significant clinical improvement, with several going into clinical remission; mucosal healing was less consistent, but was observed in some patients

Suskind et al. Nutritional therapy in pediatric Crohn disease: the specific carbohydrate diet. 2014. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.

  • Retrospective chart review of 7 pediatric CD patients
  • All symptoms were notably resolved at a routine clinic visit 3 months after initiating the diet. Each patient’s laboratory indices, including serum albumin, C-reactive protein, hematocrit, and stool calprotectin, either normalized or significantly improved during follow-up clinic visits

Walters et al. Analysis of Gut Microbiome and Diet Modification in Patients with Crohn’s Disease. 2014.

  • Very small but interesting crossover trial where 5 CD patients followed the SCD or a low-residue diet for 30 days each, with a 30-day washout period in between diets
  • SCD resulted in increased microbial diversity, including an increase in F. prausnitzii, an anti-inflammatory commensal; low-residue resulted in decreased microbial diversity
  • Of note, microbial profile did not return to baseline during the washout period

Oliva et al. Clinical and mucosal improvement with specific carbohydrate diet in pediatric Crohn disease. 2014. Dig Liv Dis.

  • Unclear what this is from the abstract

Kakodkar et al. The Bacterial Microbiome of IBD Patients on the Specific Carbohydrate Diet (SCD). 2013. Am J Gastroenterol.

  • Characterization of the fecal microbiomes of 20 IBD patients on SCD and 20 IBD patient controls; half had CD, half had UC
  • Some differences were observed, but none of much significance

Tieman, Jill. A Case Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in a ten year old girl and the use of the Specific Carbohydrate Diet. 2008. Nutritional Perspectives: Journal of the Council on Nutrition.

  • Improvements seen immediately in 10-year-old girl with UC upon beginning SCD.

Nieves, Raquel and Jackson, Roger T. Specific carbohydrate diet in treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. 2004. Tenn Med.

  • No abstract available, and can’t find full text anywhere

Related

Therapeutic Diets for IBD Crohn's disease, Elaine Gotschall, gut bacteria, IBD, microbiome, SCD, Specific Carbohydrate Diet, ulcerative colitis

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

 

Hi! I’m Alyssa. This website is where I house all of my musings and investigations and pet research projects – topics ranging from autoimmune disease to nutrition to adult palate expansion to psychology and nervous system therapy. I hope you enjoy this awkwardly cropped poor resolution photo of me playing mini golf. If you want to know more about me, click here!

Recent Comments

  • Alyssa Luck on Polyvagal Theory: A Critical Appraisal
  • Alyssa Luck on Can L-Glutamine Cause Brain Fog? {Monday Musings}
  • Tray on Can L-Glutamine Cause Brain Fog? {Monday Musings}
  • Oldmike on Ketone Supplements for Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease
  • Alyssa Luck on Ketone Supplements for Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease

alyssa.luck

alyssa.luck
Photo dump from the last year. Thanks to everyone Photo dump from the last year. Thanks to everyone who made 28 the best yet - excited for 29🥰

(PS. In case anyone wants to know what it’s like in my head, I was going to write something like “year 28” or “my 28th year” but then I realized that the year between your 28th and 29th birthdays is not your 28th year of life, it’s your 29th year. I am turning 29 because I have been alive for 29 years. So then I had a whole thing about how to word it without being inaccurate and ended up going with what you see above which is vague and weird but the point is it was a good year and I love all the people in my life dearly)
Biology of Belief (2005) was written by Bruce Lipt Biology of Belief (2005) was written by Bruce Lipton, who earned a PhD in developmental biology in 1971 and was an anatomy professor and academic researcher in the 70s and 80s. Despite the book's presentation and Lipton's background, this is not a science book. It is an exposition of an ideology, supported by haphazard and poorly contextualized nuggets of evidence, rhetorical leaps, and a mind-boggling overuse of analogies. 

The book largely failed to deliver on its promised content. What it does is argue for the primacy of the environment over DNA in controlling life; propose that the cell membrane rather than the nucleus is the "brain" of the cell; invoke quantum physics to explain why modern medicine fails; explain that our behavior is largely controlled by our subconscious mind; inform parents that they therefore have a great deal of control over the destiny of their children; and conclude that humans must become nonviolent protectors of the environment and of humanity because Everything Is Connected.

It’s not that these points aren’t relevant to the topic at hand - they are. But they were not connected in a coherent way that would explain how “belief” actually works (like…biologically), and the treatment of scientific concepts throughout was careless, or perhaps disingenuous.

I think he's correct about many things, some of them being common knowledge. For instance, the "new" science of epigenetics is now old news, as is the critical role of parenting and early environment in shaping a child’s future. But however important these and attendant concepts may be, the book did not do a good job explaining, supporting, or connecting them. 

As far as practical guidance, he refers the reader to a list of resources on his website, which is fine, but I expected some scientific insight into how/why those modalities work. None was given. 

On the plus side, the book was quite thought-provoking, and I came away with loads of references and topics to follow up on. My favorite line? "There cannot be exceptions to a theory; exceptions simply mean that a theory is not fully correct."
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science (section 382) Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science (section 382), as quoted in the introduction to Thus Spoke Zarathustra because I like the translation better.
This paper totally changed the way I think about e This paper totally changed the way I think about early nervous system development and the relationship between physiology and sociality. 

The authors propose that newborn babies are not inherently social, and have just one goal in life: physiological homeostasis. I.e. staying alive. This means nutrients, warmth, and regulation of breath and heart rate, i.e. autonomic arousal (it’s well-accepted that newborns sync their breathing and heart rate with caregivers through skin to skin contact). 

All these things are traditionally provided by a loving caregiver. So what the baby experiences during the first weeks of life, over and over, is a shift from physiological perturbation to homeostasis (a highly rewarding event inherently) REPEATEDLY PAIRED with things like the sound of a caregiver’s voice and seeing their face. Thus, over time, the face/voice stimuli become rewarding as well. 

The authors argue that THIS is the beginning of humans’ wiring for sociality, and may explain why loving social interactions can have such a profound regulating effect on physiology throughout life: because the brain was trained for it at an early age. 

This framework holds all kinds of fascinating implications for what happens if that initial “training” isn’t so ideal. What if the return to nutritional homeostasis via feeding is paired with negative expressions and vocalizations rather than loving ones, perhaps as could occur with PPD? What happens if the caregiver has poor autonomic regulation, such that social stimuli become paired with cardiorespiratory overexcitement in the baby? Could that have potential for influencing later introversion vs extroversion? (Because if social interaction is paired with autonomic overexcitement, that could lead to social interaction literally being more energetically draining, which is what introverts experience. Thoughts?)

For my energy metabolism enthusiasts: Table 1 in the paper draws a link between metabolic rate and sociality across species. Swipe for a screenshot. 

Anyway, check out the paper! It’s free, just google “growing a social brain pdf.”
I’ll be under general anesthesia in a couple day I’ll be under general anesthesia in a couple days to have two tooth implants placed, and I think I’ll take the opportunity to have a little heart-to-heart with my subconscious mind. A bit of medically-assisted self-hypnosis, if you will. 

I randomly stumbled upon these papers a couple months ago - an RCT showing reduced post-op pain in patients who listened to recorded positive messages while under general anesthesia, plus a post-hoc analysis of the same data that found reduced post-op nausea and vomiting in a subset of high-risk patients. 

The full review paper from the first slide is unfortunately in German, but it has long been recognized that even when unconscious, the patient is listening (for better or for worse). 

It boggles my mind that it isn’t standard of care to have patients listen to recordings like this while under sedation, considering that almost nothing could be easier, safer, or cheaper, and we have at least some evidence of significant efficacy. I mean c’mon, what more could you want from an intervention? 

(Yeah, I know. Profit. If anyone still thinks that our medical system operates with patient well-being as the foremost goal, you’re deluding yourself.)

“There should be a fundamental change in the way patients are treated in the operating room and intensive care unit, and background noise and careless conversations should be eliminated.”

“Perhaps it is now time to finally heed this call and to use communication with unconscious patients that goes beyond the most necessary announcement of interventions and is therapeutically effective through positive suggestions. When in doubt, assume that the patient is listening.”
If you've seen "vagus nerve exercises" that have y If you've seen "vagus nerve exercises" that have you moving your eyes or tilting your head, you've probably encountered the work of Stanley Rosenberg. The exercises he created and introduced in his 2017 book now appear in instructional videos all over the internet. 
 
The book itself has much to recommend it: it's accessible, it's practical, it's inspiring. But it has one major flaw: the solid practical and informational content regarding the cranial nerves is framed in terms of the scientifically dubious polyvagal theory. 
 
I particularly enjoyed the book as an introduction to the therapeutic arena of bodywork, of which Rosenberg is a skilled practitioner. His book is full of case reports that demonstrate how immensely powerful extremely subtle movements and physical manipulations can be. These do need to be kept in perspective: it's a small sample size of the most remarkable cases, and the results were achieved within the supportive clinical environment of a skilled practitioner. You can tell from his descriptions how refined his technique is. But nevertheless, it was a paradigm-shifting read for me, and the exercises give you something concrete to play around with. 
 
The book also brought the cranial nerves and the concept of “social engagement” to the fore as arbiters of health. Rosenberg has a solid background in cranial nerve anatomy and shares many interesting tidbits and considerations that you don’t typically hear; for instance, the potential impact of dental and orthodontic work on cranial nerve function.
 
So, is it worth reading? If any of the above piques your interest, go for it! Just read my post on polyvagal theory first – you can use the book to practice separating the wheat (solid informational content) from the chaff (pseudoscientific framing). If nothing else, the book is a nice reminder that genuine healers who get lasting results for their patients do exist.

But if you just want to try the exercises, you can easily find them all on YouTube. 

“You learn techniques to understand principles. When you understand the principles, you will create your own techniques.” -Stanley Rosenberg
Load More Follow on Instagram

Recent Posts

  • Polyvagal Theory: A Critical Appraisal
  • Lymphatic Support for Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease
  • Heart Rate Variability 101: What It Is, How It’s Measured, and Controversies in the Literature
  • Autonomic Nervous System 101: Anatomy and Physiology
  • Vitamin A Detox Diet for Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease

Categories

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Monochrome Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in